NASA Logo CERES/SARB Surface Properties CERES Logo


Surface Home


Maps
    Scene Type

   Albedo

   Emissivity

   Water Map

   Digital Elev


   Lookup by
   Lat/Lon



   Download
   Data

   Related Links


NASA Privacy Statement

Surface Map Discussion

These pages explain how SARB surface maps are utilized to provide surface spectral albedo and emissivity for running the Fu & Liou code operationally.

The Surface and Atmospheric Radiation Budget (SARB) working group will make accurate calculations of atmospheric column heating rates on a global scale. To make such profiles the SARB group will use the delta-two stream (for SW, 2/4 for LW) radiation transfer code developed by Fu & Liou. Shortwave spectral albedos are required in fifteen bands from 0.2 to 5.0 microns. Longwave spectral emissivities are in required in twelve bands between 2850 and 0 cm-1. The spectral albedo and emissivities are determined via a table lookup based on the scene type underlying the CERES footprint. These values will be adjusted due to solar zenith angle, cloud condition and surface conditions within the field-of-view of the instrument. To define the surface of the globe the SARB group will use the 17 scene types defined by the International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP) plus Tundra, fresh snow, and Ice scene types. These types are assumed known on a 10 minute (1/6 of a degree) equal angle map covering the globe.

Except for water surfaces (which are treated separately) surface spectral properties for the Fu & Liou code are selected based on observed scene type. Imager data from the same satellite (TRMM - VIRS, TERRA & AQUA - MODIS) are collocated inside the CERES footprint and on the CERES scene type map. This determines the percentage of each scene type within the CERES footprint. The imager data is convolved with the CERES point spread function providing an energy weighting function for each scene type. A table lookup determines spectral albedo (emissivity) for each scene type which are then weighted by the scene type percentages from the imager and integrated giving a spectral albedo (emissivity) curve for the entire footprint. If the footprint is clear, a TOA to surface parameterization is used to determine broadband albedo and this is used to adjust the spectral curve up or down such that the spectral integral of the albedo is equal to the observed broadband albedo. If snow is found overlaying land adjustments are made according to the results Betts and Ball, 1997.

For partly cloudy and overcast conditions there is no retreieval surface broadband albedo. To compensate, a history map of the clear sky albedo is maintained. This "most recent history" map supplies a data base from a recently observed albedo can be chosen for correcting the scene dependent spectral albedos. For cloudy conditions between 5% and 50% cloud the historical values will be adjusted to the current solar zenith angle. For 50% to 100% cloud condition, a diffuse angle of 53deg will be used as the solar zenith angle with which to adjust the broadband albedo.

Table 1 shows the CERES scene types and the source of the spectral albedo curve for each type. (Text List of Table 1.) The determination of the spectral emissivities is documented in NASA Technical Paper "Surface Emissivity Maps for Use in Satellite Retrievals of Longwave Radiation". A complete description of the land surface types as defined by IGBP are given below in Appendix A.

International Geosphere Biosphere Programme Global Land Cover types.
Source of Spectral Albedo Curve
CERES/SARB Scene Type Spectral Curve Source
1. Evergreen Needleleaf Forest
2. Evergreen Broadleaf Forest
3. Deciduous Needleleaf Forest
4. Deciduous Broadleaf Forest
5. Mixed Deciduous Forest
6. Closed Shrubland
7. Open Shrubland
8. Woody Savanna
9. Savanna
10. Grassland
11. Permenant Wetland
12. Cropland
13. Urban
14. Crop/Natural Veg. Mosaic
15. Permanent Snow/Ice
16. Barren/Desert
17. Water Bodies
18. Tundra
19. Fresh Snow
20. Sea Ice
Briegleb et al. (1985)
Briegleb et al. (1985)(1)
Briegleb et al. (1985)
Briegleb et al. (1985)(3)
Briegleb et al. (1985)
Briegleb et al. (1985)
Pinker & Karnieli (1995)
Briegleb et al. (1985)
CARE Experiment (1998)(10)
CARE Experiment (1998)
Briegleb & Ramanathan (1982)
CARE Experiment (1998)
Briegleb et al. (1985)(18)
Briegleb et al. (1985)(12)
Grenfell et al. (1984)
Pinker & Karnieli (1995)
Oceans Surface Model
Briegleb et al. (1985)
Bowker et al. (1985)
Briegleb and Ramanathan. (1982)
Note: Sources with numbers in parantheses indicate that this spectral curve is a duplicate of that number.

Details on Spectral Albedos

From various sources each scene type is assigned a spectral albedo and emissivity. As the spectral intervals defined in literature do not match those required a set of weights were developed using MODTRAN surface insolation to interpolate (extrapolate) spectral albedos to the required limits.
For example, the original Briegleb et al. shortwave spectral intervals are:

   0.2-0.5, 0.5-0.7, 0.7-0.85, 0.85-4.00 microns,

with Fu & Liou shortwave spectral bands:

Band  1        2        3          4          5          6
   0.2-0.7, 0.7-1.3, 1.3-1.80, 1.80-2.50, 2.50-3.50, 3.50-4.00 microns.
(The first Fu & Liou band has subsequently been divided into 10 sub-bands.
A list of the spectral intervals and spectral albedos can be found at: Spectral Information.)

Laboratory measurements of individual leaves, and the 2.1um channel reflectances from MODIS, verify that the extrapolation of the 0.85-4.0 micron albedo value into the near IR Fu & Liou bands is inappropriate. To correct this in the SARB spectral curves a set of ratios were calculated based on several plots from Bowker et al.(1985). Two ratios were defined:

  R1 = refl(1.6um)/refl(1.0um)
  R2 = refl(2.1um)/refl(1.0um)
Where "refl" is the reflectance from a Bowker et al. spectral curve. These values were then multiplied by the spectral reflectance in the appropriate Fu & Liou spectral band.
  Fu(3)*R1, Fu(4 through 6)*R2.
This changes the value of the integrated reflectance between the original and updated spectral curves. A final correction is made such that the integrated reflectance of the 2nd through 6th Fu bands is the same for both the original and updated spectral albedos. (This is why in everything but the Wetlands scene the 2nd Fu band reflectance has shifted above the original curve.)

Leaf types used to calculate the ratios from Bowker et al. and the IGBP type adjusted are given in the following table. The spectral adjustments for Pine Needles, American Elm and Sycamore were based on the Bowker et al. measurements of living vegetation. A dead or decaying canopy would be expected to have smoother spectral features than are shown in the figures. We have not yet included seasonal variations in canopy reflectance.

     IGBP Type (#)         Bowker et al. Spectral Curve
     -------------         ----------------------------
( 1)Evergreen Needleleaf   Ponderosa Pine Needles (#62) 
( 2)Evergreen Broadleaf    Am. Elm(#55) & Sycamore(#66) (averaged)
( 4)Deciduous Broadleaf    Am. Elm(#55) & Sycamore(#66) (averaged)
( 6)Closed Shrubs          Mesquite(#80 & #81)  	(averaged)

Spectral albedo from the CARE (1998) experiment include Grass and Cropland and an example of the original curve and the interpolated values in the Fu & Liou bands are shown in the figure below.

Grass

Details on Albedo Solution Over Water


Apendix A. The IGBP Land Cover Classification*

1. Evergreen Needleleaf Forests: Lands dominated by trees with a percent canopy cover >60% and height exceeding 2 meters. Almost all trees remain green all year. Canopy is never without green foliage.
2. Evergreen Broadleaf Forests: Lands dominated by trees with a percent canopy cover >60% and height exceeding 2 meters. Almost all trees remain green all year. Canopy is never without green foliage.
3. Deciduous Needleleaf Forests: Lands dominated by trees with a percent canopy cover >60% and height exceeding 2 meters. Consists of seasonal needleleaf tree communitites with an annual cycle of leaf-on and leaf-off periods.
4. Deciduous Broadleaf Forests: Lands dominated by trees with a percent canopy cover >60% and height exceeding 2 meters. Consists of seasonal broadleaf tree communitites with an annual cycle of leaf-on and leaf-off periods.
5. Mixed Forests: Lands dominated by trees with a percent canopy cover >60% and height exceeding 2 meters. Consists of tree communities with interspersed mixtures or mosaics of the other four forest cover types. None of the forest types exceeds 60% of landscape.
6. Closed Shrublands: Lands with woody vegetation less than 2 meters tall and with shrub canopy cover >60%. The shrub foliage can be either evergreen or deciduous.
7. Open Shrublands: Lands with woody vegetation less than 2 meters tall and with shrub canopy cover between 10%-60%. The shrub foliage can be either evergreen or deciduous.
8. Woody Savannahs: Lands with herbaceous and other understory systems, and with forest canopy cover between 30%-60%. The forest cover height exceeds 2 meters.
9. Savannahs: Lands with herbaceous and other understory systems, and with forest canopy cover between 10%-30%. The forest cover height exceeds 2 meters.
10. Grasslands: Lands with herbaceous types of cover. Tree and shrub cover is <10%.
11. Permanent Wetlands: Lands with a permanent mixture of water and herbaceous or woody vegetation that cover extensive areas. The vegetation can be present in either salt, brackish, or fresh water.
12. Croplands: Lands covered with temporary crops followed by harvest and a bare soil period (e.g., single and multiple cropping systems.) Note that perennial woody crops will be classified as the appropriate forest or shrub land cover type.
13. Urban and Built-Up: Land covered by buildings and other man-made structures. Note that this class will not be maped from the AVHRR imagery but will be developed from the populated places layer that is part of the Digital Chart of the World (Danko, 1992).
14. Cropland/Natural Vegetation Mosaics: Lands with a mosaic of croplands, forest, shrublands, and grasslands in which no one component comprises more than 60% of the landscape.
15. Snow and Ice: Lands under snow and/or ice cover throughout the year.
16. Barren: Lands made up of exposed soil, sand, rocks, or snow which never have more than 10% vegetated cover during any time of the year.
17. Water Bodies: Oceans, seas, lakes, reservoirs, and rivers. They can be either fresh or salt water bodies.
-----------
18. Tundra: Lands defined by IGBP to be Barren where the Olson vegetation map, when overlayed on top of the IGBP defines these locations to be type "Tundra".
-----------
*This information was taken from "The DIS 1km Land Cover Data Set" by Alan Belward and Tom Loveland. GLOBAL CHANGE, The IGBP Newsletter, #27, Sep., 1996.

Apendix B. References

Belward, A., and T. Loveland, The DIS 1km Land Cover Data Set,GLOBAL CHANGE, The IGBP Newsletter, #27, Sep., 1996.

Betts, A.K., and J.H. Ball, Albedo Over the Boreal Forest, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 28901-28909, 1997.

Bowker, D.E., R.E. Davis, D.L. Myrick, K. Stacy, and W.T. Jones, Spectral Reflectances of Natural Targets for use in Remote Sensing Studies, NASA Ref. Pub., 1139, June 1985.

Briegleb, B.P., P. Minnis, V. Ramanathan, and E. Harrison, Comparison of Regional Clear-Sky Albedos Inferred from Satellite Observations and Models Comparisons, J. Clim. Appl. Meteor., 25, 214-226, 1986.

Briegleb, B.P., and V. Ramanathan, Spectral and Diurnal Variations in Clear Sky Planetary Albedo, J. Appl. Meteor., 21, 1160-1171, 1982.

Grenfell, T.C., S.G. Warren, and P.C. Mullen, Reflection of Solar Radiation By The Antarctic Snow Surface at Ultraviolet, Visible, and Near-Infrared Wavelengths, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 18669-18684, 1994.

Payne, R.E., Albedo of the Sea Surface, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 959-970, 1972.

Pinker, R.T., and A. Karnieli, Characteristic Spectral Reflectance of A Semi-Arid Environment, Int. J. Rem. Sens., 1995.

Staylor W.F. and A.C. Wilber, Global surface albedos estimated from ERBE data, Proceedings, 7th Conf. on Atmos. Rad., San Francisco, CA, 1990.

Wilber, A.C., D.P. Kratz, S.K. Gupta,
Surface Emissivity Maps for Use of Satellite Retrievals of Longwave Radiation, NASA Tech. Pub., TP-99-209362, 1999.


Responsible NASA Official: Dr. Thomas Charlock
Data/Web Questions: David Rutan
Last Updated: 2007/10/08

Feedback on Langley Products and Services